As global jurisdictions compete to attract litigation funding investment and complex disputes, the choices governments make around regulation have never mattered more.
Co-authored by Angeion Group International and Lord Alex Carlile of Berriew CBE KC, this comprehensive report examines how the UK's litigation funding framework compares with leading international markets, evaluating six jurisdictions through the lenses of certainty, viability, and efficiency. Drawing on legal analysis, international benchmarking, and practical market insight, the report explores the impact of recent developments, including PACCAR, and outlines evidence-based policy recommendations to strengthen the UK's competitiveness, investor confidence, and access to justice.
What You'll Learn
Inside this report you'll discover:
- How the UK compares with Singapore, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New York, and Pennsylvania
- The impact of PACCAR on litigation funding and market confidence
- A framework for evaluating litigation funding competitiveness
- International regulatory approaches and lessons learned
- Policy recommendations for strengthening the UK's position as a global dispute resolution centre
- Why certainty, viability, and efficiency are essential to attracting litigation funding investment